Slip Resistance - Coated With Glass Fusion™

TCA TEST REPORT NUMBER: TCA-145-04

TEST SUBJECT MATERIAL: Identified by client as Coated

TEST PROCEDURE: ASTM C1028: "Standard Test Method for Determining the Static Coefficient of Friction of Ceramic Tile and Other Like Surfaces by the Horizontal Dynamometer Pull-Meter Method"
• A Chatillon DFIS 100 digital force gauge was used to measure each pull in pound-force.
• A 3 x 3 x 1/8 inch piece of Neolite was used as the sensor.
• Internal calibration used in lieu of dry calibration factor.

TEST RESULTS: The average static coefficient of friction of four (4) pulls on each tile was as follows:

  AS RECEIVED AFTER CLEANING
Tile 1: Dry:
.94
.94
Wet:
1.30
1.33
Tile 2: Dry:
1.04
1.02
Wet:
1.35
1.04
Tile 3: Dry:
1.00
1.04
Wet
1.29
1.29

The average static coefficient of friction of twelve (12) pulls was as follows:

  AS RECEIVED AFTER CLEANING
Dry:
.99
1.00
Wet:
1.31
1.29

Slip Resistance - Uncoated

TCA TEST REPORT NUMBER: TCA-145-04

TEST SUBJECT MATERIAL: Identified by client as Coated

TEST PROCEDURE: ASTM C1028: "Standard Test Method for Determining the Static Coefficient of Friction of Ceramic Tile and Other Like Surfaces by the Horizontal Dynamometer Pull-Meter Method"
• A Chatillon DFIS 100 digital force gauge was used to measure each pull in pound-force.
• A 3 x 3 x 1/8 inch piece of Neolite was used as the sensor.
• Internal calibration used in lieu of dry calibration factor.

TEST RESULTS: The average static coefficient of friction of four (4) pulls on each tile was as follows:

  AS RECEIVED AFTER CLEANING
Tile 1: Dry:
.84
.73
Wet:
.44
.43
Tile 2: Dry:
.87
.80
Wet:
.40
.39
Tile 3: Dry:
.80
.76
Wet
.41
.39

The average static coefficient of friction of twelve (12) pulls was as follows:

  AS RECEIVED AFTER CLEANING
Dry:
.84
.76
Wet:
.42
.40

Test Result Summary

Test results compare slip resistance. Glass Fusion™ is 15% less slippery than the dry ceramic tile tested and 65% less slippery than the wet ceramic tile tested.